Risk Management System
DBJ has a risk management system in place designed to handle a variety of specific risks, with the aim of maintaining the soundness and creditability of management as it pursues business based on management plans. Specifically, risks are identified, evaluated, monitored, and controlled in each risk category and in comprehensive risk areas, and are managed within the scope of our management capabilities from a comprehensive understanding of each risk.
The Board of Directors sets out basic policies for comprehensive risk management, receives reports about risk management conditions, and ensures the effectiveness of risk management functions. The Executive Committee creates related rules based on these basic policies and deliberates on matters of importance that directly relate to management policies. In line with these basic policies and rules, the ALM & Risk Management Committee discusses and makes decisions on matters essential to the risk management system for financial risk, such as credit risk, while the General Risk Management Committee deliberates on non-financial risk, such as administrative risk. Both committees regularly, and whenever necessary, conduct risk monitoring.
Comprehensive Risk Management
At DBJ, we measure the amount of each type of risk using uniform and logical methodologies to the greatest extent possible, while considering the uniqueness of each risk category. As the sum total of this risk, comprehensive risk is managed within the context of our risk guidelines. These risk guidelines are determined by the Executive Committee and reflect risk conditions in the existing portfolio and near-term business plans, within the framework for capital allocation based on the amount of our own capital.
Credit risk refers to the risk of sustaining losses resulting from a decline in or loss of the value of assets due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. DBJ provides corporate loans and non-recourse loans, making credit risk acquisition a source of profits. As such, it represents a significant risk category, and DBJ conducts credit management of individual projects as well as bank-wide portfolio management, accordingly.
Credit Administration of Individual Loans
When making an investment or loan, DBJ examines the entity's
project viability and the project's profitability from a fair and
impartial standpoint. Based on the Banking Act and the Act on
Emergency Measures for the Revitalization of the Financial
Functions (Act No. 132 of 1998), DBJ carries out independent
asset assessments in an effort to properly grasp credit risk in
a timely fashion. The results of self-assessments are subject
to an audit by an auditing corporation and are reported to
Credit risk and amounts are monitored to confirm that they are within the limits established for individual borrowers.
The sales and credit analysis departments hold separate roles in the screening and administering of credit for individual projects, and each department keeps the operations of the other in check.
The Committee on Investment and Loan Decisions meets as needed to deliberate important issues concerning the management and operation of individual projects.
These mutual checking functions serve to ensure the appropriateness of the finance operation and management system.
Borrower Rating System
DBJ’s borrower rating system measures creditworthiness by combining an evaluation point rating and a borrower category rating, with the results quantifying a potential client’s credit circumstances.
The evaluation point rating selects indicator and evaluation categories that are common across all industries, scoring the creditworthiness of the potential borrower quantitatively and qualitatively. On the other hand, the borrower category rating measures specific items related to the borrower, looking at the borrower’s realistic financial condition, cash flows, and debt repayment history, generating a comprehensive assessment of a borrower’s repayment capacity.
Asset Self-Assessment System
Asset self-assessments are used to define asset classifications that will offset recoverability risk or the degree of risk of value loss based on the borrower rating, the corresponding borrower category, and the collateral or guarantee status. Such assessments help DBJ establish timely and appropriate amortization schedules and reserve levels.
Borrower Rating Classifications
|Borrower category||Borrower rating||Definition||Claims classified under the Financial Revitalization Act|
|Normal borrowers||1–8||Borrowers with favorable business conditions who have been confirmed to have no particular problematic financial circumstances.||Normal claims|
|Borrowers requiring caution||9–11||Borrowers in this category are experiencing week or unstable business conditions, or are having issues with their finances. These borrowers need to be managed with caution.|
|Substandard borrowers||12||Either some or all of the debt of these borrowers requiring caution is under management.||Substandard claims|
|Borrowers in danger of bankruptcy||13||Borrowers in this category are having financial difficulties but are not bankrupt. Management improvement plans and the like are progressing poorly, and these borrowers are highly likely to fall into bankruptcy.||Doubtful claims|
|Effectively bankrupt borrowers||14||Although not legally or formally in bankruptcy, these borrowers are experiencing severe financial difficulties and are realistically falling into bankruptcy as their lack of potential for restructuring has been confirmed.||Claims in bankruptcy, reorganization claims, and similar claims|
|Bankrupt borrowers||15||These borrowers are in bankruptcy, legally and formally. Specifically, these borrowers are in bankruptcy or liquidation, under corporate reorganization, bankruptcy proceedings or civil rehabilitation, or have had transactions suspended by a bill clearinghouse.|
DBJ performs a statistical analysis of data based on borrower
ratings and calculates the loan portfolio’s overall exposure to
credit risk. Credit risk exposure is classified as unexpected loss
(UL), the maximum loss that could be incurred at a certain rate
of probability minus the expected loss (EL), the average loss
expected during a specific loan period.
Large borrowers are identified based on standardized loan balances defined by the borrower’s rating and monitored as required in accordance with management policies.
Investment risk refers to the risk of sustaining losses resulting from a decline in or loss of the economic value of assets due to worsening financial conditions for entities receiving funds and to changing market environments. DBJ’s investments include the provision of mezzanine and equity financing, particularly to unlisted entities, such as corporations, funds, infrastructure, and real estate. As a source of profits, investments represent one of DBJ’s most significant risk categories. DBJ makes investment decisions and manages individual investments as well as its bank-wide portfolio accordingly.
|Corporate mezzanine financing||Credit risk, etc.||Dividends, etc.|
(including listed shares)
|Real estate and infrastructure, etc.||Risk of change in asset value
Operating risk at operating entities
The Executive Committee determines our investment policy following deliberations each fiscal year by the Investment Management Committee, based on our corporate philosophy of striking a balance between social value and economic value.
This policy takes into consideration the balance in risks and returns in the overall portfolio, while also reflecting the external business environment, including changes in market conditions and industrial structure, and a performance analysis of the existing portfolio.
Credit Management of Individual Projects
Investment decisions for individual projects are made after exit strategies are determined in case a downside scenario materializes, and targets are set for returns based on the type of investment, which is also examined for managing credit risk.
In project management, DBJ periodically monitors every project and has established the Chief Investment Management Office to enhance monitoring of key projects and improve the management of investment risks in the overall portfolio.
The main assets in DBJ’s investment portfolio are unlisted stock and mezzanine financing, and risk exposure is calculated focusing on risk characteristics in each category of investment and on differences in recovery methods.
More specifically, assets we aim to earn returns on from primarily business cash flows are evaluated with a focus on credit risk. On the other hand, assets on which we expect to see returns by selling to a third party or the market are evaluated in the context of market risk. In this way, risk exposure is calculated by applying evaluations of credit risk and market risk.
The primary focuses in terms of market risk are interest rate risk and exchange risk. DBJ classifies market risk as passive risk pertaining to investment and loan activities. DBJ does not have any trading-related risk because it does not engage in trading (specified transactions).
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate fluctuations can create mismatches on rates of
interest on assets and liabilities or on interest periods, creating
the risk of reduced profits or the risk of losses. Interest rate risk
can reduce the economic value of DBJ’s assets or interest
Based on monitoring through multifaceted indices, such as value at risk (VaR) and interest rate sensitivity analyses (duration and basis point value), as well as ALM policies established by the ALM & Risk Management Committee, DBJ conducts comprehensive management of current assets and liabilities to optimize net interest expenses and economic value by adequately controlling interest rate risk and financial liquidity risk.
DBJ engages in interest rate swaps to control interest rate risk. Counterparty risk in these swap transactions is managed within the limits of the creditworthiness of the counterparty. DBJ also seeks to reduce risk through margin transfers by means of a centralized exchange and mutual credit support annex.
Exchange risk is the risk of loss due to volatility in exchange rates, and this risk affects entities holding a net excess of assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Exchange risk derives from financing in foreign currencies and issuing foreign currency bonds. However, DBJ uses exchange swaps and other instruments to limit this risk in terms of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at a net-base position.
Liquidity risk is the risk of a mismatch occurring in the periods
when funds are used and raised or of an unexpected outflow
of funds, causing differences in the flow of funds (cash liquidity
risk). Such situations make securing funds difficult and create
situations in which interest rates on borrowed funds are substantially
higher than usual rates. At other times, because of
market complexities, entities in these circumstances may
become unable to participate in market transactions, compelling
them to conduct transactions under substantially less favorable
terms than otherwise would be the case. The risk of losses for
these reasons is known as market liquidity risk.
As its main methods of acquiring funds, rather than carrying out short-term funding by issuing commercial paper, DBJ relies on the stable procurement of long-term funds from the Japanese government’s Fiscal Investment and Loan Program and government-guaranteed bonds while issuing bonds and taking out long-term loans. To prepare for unforeseen cash flow crunches caused by shocks to financial markets, DBJ manages funds to ensure sufficient cash on hand to cover planned capital outflows under envisioned stress conditions. DBJ has formulated countermeasures based on contingency plans and has created different categories for fund operation modes based on the degree of constriction in cash flows.
DBJ defines operational risk as the risk of loss arising from
internal processes, people or systems that are inappropriate or
nonfunctioning, or from external events. DBJ works to establish
a risk management system to minimize risk and prevent
potential risk from materializing. The General Risk Management
Committee has been established to deliberate topics concerning
operational risk management.
Within operational risk management, DBJ conducts administrative risk management and system risk management as described below.
Administrative Risk Management
Administrative risk refers to the risk of sustaining losses resulting from employees neglecting to perform their duties correctly or from accidents, fraud, and the like. To reduce or prevent administrative risk, DBJ prepares manuals, performs checks on administrative procedures, provides education and training, and uses systems to reduce the burden of administrative duties.
System Risk Management
System risk refers to the risk of loss due to a computer system breakdown or malfunction, system defects, or improper computer use. DBJ has implemented the following internal processes to optimize system risk management and properly manage risk with regard to system risk. The System Risk Management Division is responsible for managing DBJ’s system risk centrally, based on its system risk management regulations. By determining security standards from a variety of viewpoints—from information system planning and development to operation and use—the department extends the risk management system bank-wide and addresses appropriate system risk management operations.
In addition to managing comprehensive risks based on risk exposure, DBJ performs stress tests on its own capital adequacy in order to ensure uninterrupted financial functions, including Crisis Response Operations, while maintaining the soundness of management under stressful conditions. These stress tests are also used to evaluate the degree of impact on our own capital from the creation of and changes to medium-term management plans and business plans, as well as in the examination of possible responses to various management issues.
Based on the latest forecasts for economic conditions, these stress tests involve scenarios that also take into account DBJ’s financial position. We also verify the adequacy of our cash liquidity risk management, through reevaluations of our capital adequacy by factoring in various scenarios for how risk exposure increases as a result of erosion in our own capital and of changes in our portfolio of loans and investments.
Business Continuity Initiatives
DBJ has prepared a business continuity plan (BCP) to protect
the interests of its stakeholders, including its clients, its shareholder,
and its executives and employees, as well as to fulfill its
social mission. The BCP aims to ensure the continuity and
rapid recovery of core operations in the event of emergencies,
such as natural disasters (in particular, large-scale earthquakes),
influenza and other pandemics, system failures, and power
The BCP describes in an easy-to-understand format the role of the Disaster Response Committee, work priorities, and specific actions and procedures to be taken in the event of a disaster. When drawing up policies for business continuity and restoration, the Company envisions specific incidents, such as an earthquake underneath the Tokyo metropolis or a novel virus outbreak, and methodically decides how to respond to anticipated damage in each disaster scenario.
Measures to Ensure Business Continuity
We have prepared a variety of measures to ensure business continuity.
Enhanced System Robustness
We have ensured advanced security levels at the main center and created a backup center to operate in the event that the main center ceases to operate.
Multilayered Communication Procedures
We have introduced a safety confirmation system to quickly determine the whereabouts and status of executives and employees even at night and on holidays. In addition, we have distributed satellite telephones to key locations and personnel to ensure multilayered communication procedures.
Chain of Command and Delegation of Authority
To assure that decision-making concerning the continuity of core operations is prompt and certain, in the event it becomes necessary to execute the plans of the Disaster Response Committee, we have put in place a chain of command and an alternative hierarchy by which authority can be delegated.
Clarification of Initial Response and Procedures for Continuing or Recovering Core Operations
For individual business units, we have established in advance the procedures for the initial response and the continuation or recovery of core operations so that relevant divisions can respond quickly and with certainty on core operations even when in a state of confusion.
Initiatives to Maintain or Improve BCP Viability
DBJ conducts various types of instruction and training of executives and regular employees to maintain or improve the viability of its BCP. Furthermore, employing a plan-do-check-act cycle, we revise the BCP to reflect training results and recent information, and the Executive Committee reviews it regularly and amends it as necessary.
Response to the TCFD Recommendations
Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015, addressing
climate change has become a major issue for Japan and the
rest of the world. Climate change is one of the management
issues that takes priority at DBJ as part of its sustainability
management efforts. While engaging in dialogue with its customers
and other stakeholders, DBJ has endeavored to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions in its business activities through its
Environmentally Rated Loan Program and DBJ
Green Building Certification.
DBJ will continue to enact climate change countermeasures and, as a financial institution, we will support our customers’ efforts focusing on the transition to a low-carbon or decarbonized society.
- Sustainability News
- Message from the President
- Policy on Sustainability
- Sustainability Management System
- Value Creation Process
- Priority Areas for the Achievement of Vision 2030
- Resolving Social Issues and Creating Value Through Our Core Businesses
- Fundamental Activities
- Collaboration with Stakeholders
- Data (Downloadable Content)